![]() |
I see Season 8 in the examples but I do not see a link to download it. Can you possibly upload it?
|
There is a mistake in season 7 the spine is correct, but the cover says season 8.
Thanks Ian |
thx
|
thanks
|
season 7 is fixed and season 8 is now up
|
Many Thanks for fixing season 7/
|
High jinks??? Really?
Who says that? and even if they do.. who spells it like that? Really? Is there anyway to get these covers without the stupid wording on the back? |
yes there is a way to have these without the stupid wording on the back, its called "make the cover yourself!! I very rarely make up the synopsis myself, as i don't like to make mistakes with wrong characters or events that have happened in the season, so i try to get them from Amazon, Play.com, Etc.
i put alot of time and effort into my covers and have no problem with constructive criticism, but what you have put is just plan rude. if you dont like anything with my covers, either download someone else's covers, or again, make it yourself. |
Here here stu.
Megablaps, I use the word high jinks and yes, I spell it correctly as well. If you don't like the synopsis make your own covers, artwork is available. Easy to complain if all you do is post scans, try making one from scratch (especially on a show you don't watch) and see if you don't cut/paste a few things. Where you been stu, haven't seen you post or send a newsletter in ages. |
Quote:
"High jinks" implies there is a lower form of "jinx"... i.e. "Low jinx" Do you use that too? It's ... "hijinx" How do I post scans? Totally untrue! ...... I created everything from scratch, except for the main character pics of course. I recreate everything to look exactly like a factory release. I have posted ONE cover...., I made a variant for an Australian release, maybe I should be flattered then... Thanks for thinking it was an original scan.. ...Nice. What have you posted? ... What have you done? Oh Yeah, Nothing. Stubuster.., Maybe my wording didn't come across right in my post (oh.. the irony... :p), The artwork is fantastic and very uniform, ... but the wording and it's style really lets it down. It's really hard to see white writing on a white background even if it is stroked ad shadowed. The source(s) you obtained the synopsis is not the best either. Just sayin.. What's wrong with that? |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:58. |