Quote:
I've just put your disc 2, series 2 label onto a dvd label template I downloaded from here and alot of the the poor cloning is still visible. That would definately be present on a print out. This is just my observation but I thought anything uploaded here had to be near perfection. These labels are at the standard that was being uploaded to Generetic in its latter days. Like I say, don't take it personally but I don't think these labels are good enough to be on this site, according to the rules set out. Thanks for your reply by the way and like I say this is constructive critisism  |
Long time past but thought I'd reply as I stumbled on this again.
Unfortunately it's a dig at my work so I do take it personally, I know how much time I spent on those and the problem is the lack of reference points as clone sources due the changing gradients coupled with where the original print goes over the clear area near the hub, the scanner sees this different to the rest and creates a lighter ring around the centre which also has to be cloned over.
As you mention Gen you may well recall that HvB and I were the primary instigators of raising the issue about falling standards and after almost a year of trying to get i0n to take action we got banned, we along with CR started this site. Bottom line is that we have stayed true to our standards for quality and protecting the work of those that upload here.
Those labels were printed out before upping to site and nothing shows on the print apart from a faint blend edge line of about 4mm length, and that is only because I know what to look for, cursory inspections would not spot it.